Time-lapse Microscopy in Preimplant Assessment of Human Embryos

Aim. Predicting the selection of euploid embryos based on morphokinetic assessment (KIDScore) of the development of preimplantation embryos using a time-lapse incubator.

Design. A retrospective study.

Materials and methods. 543 human embryos fertilized in vitro and cultured up to the fifth day of development in a time-lapse incubator using KIDScore were studied. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was performed using the Next Generation Sequencing method.

Results. It was found that euploid embryos predominate among the embryos from the oocytes of women under the age of 36 years inclusive. In women 37 years of age and older, the number of aneuploid embryos exceeds the number of euploid ones. Age limits have been established for women (24-36 years old), when it may be reasonable to use the KIDScore assessment to select euploid embryos.

Conclusion. Time-lapse microscopy does not provide an opportunity to identify methodological errors as a result of incorrect chromosome separation, which depends on the age of the mother and leads to an increase in the number of aneuploidies. For embryos from oocytes of women aged 24-36 years, with an increase in the KIDScore score, the chance of choosing a euploid embryo with the highest potential for development also increases. For embryos from oocytes of women 37 years of age and older, culturing in a time-lapse incubator with a KID Score only followed by PGT-A will increase the likelihood of choosing the most viable embryo.

1. Nazem T.G., Sekhon L., Lee J.A., Overbey J. et al. The correlation between morphology and implantation of euploid human blastocysts. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2019;38(2):169–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.10.007

2. Campbell A., Fishel S., eds. Atlas of time-lapse embryology. M.: MEDpress-inofrm; 2018. 120 p. (in Russian)

3. Korsak V.S., ed. Guide to clinical embryology. 3rd ed. M.: Media Sphera; 2022. 250 p. (in Russian)

4. Kogan I.Yu., ed. In vitro fertilization: a practical guide for doctors. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2021. 368 p. (in Russian)

5. Braun C.B., DeSantis C.E., Lee J.C., Kissin D.M. et al. Trends and outcomes of fresh and frozen donor oocyte cycles in the United States. Fertil. Steril. 2024;122(5):844–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.004

6. Setti A.S., Braga D.P.A.F., Iaconelli A., Borges E. Fresh oocyte cycles yield improved embryo quality compared with frozen oocyte cycles in an egg-sharing donation programme. Zygote. 2021;29(3):234–38. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199420000842

7. La Marca A., Capuzzo M., Imbrogno M.G., Donno V. et al. The complex relationship between female age and embryo euploidy. Minerva Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;73(1):103–10. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.20.04740-1

8. La Marca A., Capuzzo M., Longo M., Imbrogno M.G. et al. The number and rate of euploid blastocysts in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles are strongly dependent on ovarian reserve and female age. Hum. Reprod. 2022;37(10):2392–401. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac191

9. Baranov V.S., Kuznetsova T.V., Kascheeva T.K., Ivaschenko T.E. Prenatal diagnostics of genetic diseases: state and outlook. SPb.: Eco-Vector; 2020. 503 p. (in Russian)

10. Franasiak J.M., Forman E.J., Hong K.H., Werner M.D. et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil. Steril. 2014;101(3):656–63.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004

11. Wei L., Zhang J., Shi N., Luo C. et al. Association of maternal risk factors with fetal aneuploidy and the accuracy of prenatal aneuploidy screening: a correlation analysis based on 12,186 karyotype reports. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):136. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05461-4

12. Makinson C. The health consequences of teenage fertility. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 1985;17(3):132–9.

13. McCoy R.C., Summers M.C., McCollin A., Ottolini C.S. et al. Meiotic and mitotic aneuploidies drive arrest of in vitro fertilized human preimplantation embryos. Genome Med. 2023;15(1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01231-1