Эффективность дидрогестерона при угрожающем выкидыше: систематический обзор и метаанализ
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-5-53-61
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Полный текст:
Аннотация
Цель обзора: проанализировать все исследования с использованием дидрогестерона при угрожающем выкидыше (УВ) и оценить влияние лечения дидрогестероном на частоту выкидышей у женщин с УВ.
Основные положения. Многолетний опыт в рамках множества клинических исследований подтверждает, что гестагены способствуют сохранению беременности в случае УВ. Дидрогестерон и прогестерон являются наиболее подходящими гестагенами для беременных женщин. Большой процент сохранения беременности высокого риска при использовании дидрогестерона обусловлен его химической структурой. Настоящий систематический обзор и метаанализ включает данные только рандомизированных исследований, в частности основанных на сравнении дидрогестерона с плацебо. Результаты демонстрируют, что в группе пациенток, получавших дидрогестерон, частота выкидышей была статистически значимо ниже, чем в группе женщин, получавших плацебо. Эти выводы коррелируют с предыдущими данными метаанализов и обзоров рандомизированных клинических исследований 2017–2021 гг., в которых дидрогестерон также значительно снижал риск потери беременности при угрожающем и привычном выкидыше. Более того, в крупнейшем прямом сравнительном рандомизированном исследовании IPD LOTUS (2020) продемонстрирована более высокая эффективность дидрогестерона, чем у микронизированного вагинального прогестерона.
Заключение. По результатам настоящего систематического обзора и метаанализа рандомизированных клинических исследований, основанных на сравнении дидрогестерона с плацебо, у пациенток, получавших дидрогестерон, частота выкидышей была статистически значимо ниже, чем у женщин, получавших плацебо. Применение дидрогестерона не только оправданный, но крайне необходимый компонент терапии привычной потери беременности.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Н. К. ТетруашвилиРоссия
Тетруашвили Нана Картлосовна — д. м. н., доцент, заместитель директора Института акушерства по научной работе, заведующая отделом медицины плода и 2-м акушерским отделением патологии беременности
117997, г. Москва, ул. Академика Опарина, д. 4
Е. В. Ших
Россия
Ших Евгения Валерьевна — д. м. н., профессор, директор Института профессионального образования, заведующая кафедрой клинической фармакологии и пропедевтики внутренних болезней
119991, г. Москва, ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2
Список литературы
1. Hassan R., Baird D.D., Herring A.H., Olshan A.F. et al. Patterns and predictors of vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ann. Epidemiol. 2010; 20(7): 524-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.006
2. Quenby S., Gallos I.D., Dhillon-Smith R.K., Podesek M. et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021; 397(10285): 1658-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
3. Тетруашвили Н.К., Агаджанова А.А. Ведение пациенток с одно- и многоплодной беременностью и привычным выкидышем в анам незе. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2018; 2: 52-7.
4. Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е., ред. Акушерство: национальное руководство. M.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 1088 c.
5. Тетруашвили Н.К. Привычный выкидыш. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2017; 4: 70-87. https://doi.org/10.24411/2303-9698-2017-00010
6. Coomarasamy A., Devall A.J., Cheed V., Harb H. et al. A randomized trial of progesterone in women with bleeding in early pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 380(19): 1815-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813730
7. Ших Е.В. Фармакотерапия во время беременности. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2019. 208 c.
8. Benagiano G., Carrara S., Filippi V. Safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction with continuous daily administration of levononorgesterel/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptives. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2009; 3: 131-43. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s3692
9. Schindler A.E., Campagnoli C., Druckmann R., Huber J. et al. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas. 2008; 61(1-2): 171-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.11.013
10. Kale A.R., Kale A.A., Yelikar K. A comparative, randomized control trial in patients of per vaginal bleeding comparing efficacy of oral dydrogesterone versus vaginal progesterone in successful pregnancy outcome for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India. 2021; 71(6): 591-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01473-2
11. Астраханцева М.М., Мясоутова А.И., Бреусенко Л.Е., Шалина Р.И. и др. Невынашивание беременности. Возможности лечения. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2021; 20(2): 75-84. https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2021-2-75-84
12. Griesinger G., Blockeel C., Kahler E., Pexman-Fieth C. et al. Dydrogesterone as an oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal phase support: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(11): e0241044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241044
13. Ших Е.В. Клинико-фармакологические аспекты применения дидрогестерона для сохранения беременности. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2010; 4(2): 6-9.
14. Griesinger G., Tournaye H., Macklon N., Petraglia F. et al. Dydrogesterone: pharmacological profile and mechanism of action as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2019; 38(2): 249-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.017
15. Schindler A.E., Campagnoli C., Druckmann R., Huber J. et al. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas. 2003; 46(suppl.1): S7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.09.014
16. Colombo D., Ferraboschi P., Prestileo P., Toma L. A comparative molecular modeling study of dydrogesterone with other progestational agents through theoretical calculations and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006; 98(1): 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.07.009
17. Rižner T.L., Brožič P., Doucette C., Turek-Etienne T. et al. Selectivity and potency of the retroprogesterone dydrogesterone in vitro. Steroids. 2011; 76(6): 607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.043
18. Stanczyk F.Z., Hapgood J.P., Winer S., Mishell D.R. Jr. Progestogens used in postmenopausal hormone therapy: differences in their pharmacological properties, intracellular actions, and clinical effects. Endocr. Rev. 2013; 34(2): 171-208. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2012-1008
19. Тетруашвили Н.К., Серов В.Н. Гестагены при беременности высокого риска. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2022; 10(2): 31-8. https://doi.org/10.33029/2303-9698-2022-10-2-31-38
20. Ehrenskjöld M.L., Bondo B., Weile F. Treatment of threatened abortion with dydrogesterone. Ugeskr. Laeg. 1967; 129(50): 1678-1679. [Article in Danish]
21. El-Zibdeh M.Y., Yousef L.T. Dydrogesterone support in threatened miscarriage. Maturitas. 2009; 65(suppl.1): S43-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.11.013
22. Omar M.H., Mashita M.K., Lim P.S., Jamil M.A. Dydrogesterone in threatened abortion: pregnancy outcome. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005; 97(5): 421-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.08.013
23. Pandian R.U. Dydrogesterone in threatened miscarriage: a Malaysian experience. Maturitas. 2009; 65(suppl.1): S47-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.11.016
24. Геворкян М.А., Манухин И.Б., Манухина Е.И., Студёная Л.Б. Эффективность Дюфастона в лечении угрозы прерывания ранних сроков беременности. Проблемы репродукции. 2004; 10(6): 63-64.
25. Li F.H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of progesterone in the prevention or treatment of pregnancy diseases. China Foreign Med. Treat. 2018; 34: 41-3. [Article in Chinese]
26. Chan D.M.K., Cheung K.W., Ko J.K.Y., Yung S.S.F. et al. Use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(3): 587-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa327
27. Czajkowski K., Sienko J., Mogilinski M., Bros M. et al. Uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy complicated by threatened abortion supplemented with vaginal micronized progesterone or oral dydrogesterone. Fertil. Steril. 2007; 87(3): 613-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1506
28. Vincze E., Molnár B.G., Földesi I., Pál A. Treatment possibilities for threatened abortion using progesterone and progesterone-type drugs. J. Hungarian Gynaecol. 2006; 69: 281-4.
29. Siew J.Y.S., Allen J.C., Hui C.Y.Y., Ku C.Wai. et al. The randomized controlled trial of micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone (TRoMaD) for threatened miscarriage. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 228: 319-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.028
30. Liu Y.Y. A randomized controlled study of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese J. Convalescent Med. 2016; 25(02): 214-15. [Article in Chinese]
31. Lin B.Z., Guo S.Y., Chen L.F. A randomized controlled study of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. China Pract. Med. 2015; 10(34): 108-9. [Article in Chinese]
32. Tian Y.H. Clinical effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone on threatened abortion. J. Qiqihar University of Medicine. 2015; 36(21): 3194-5. [Article in Chinese]
33. Lin J.F. To explore the clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. North. Pharmacy. 2013; 10(02): 25-6. [Article in Chinese]
34. Ru L. Clinical analysis of dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. China Health Care Nutr. 2014; 24(3): 1691-2. [Article in Chinese]
35. Zhang J.Y. Clinical observation on 388 cases of threatened abortion treated with dydrogesterone. China Pharmacist. 2014; 17(06): 1006-7. [Article in Chinese]
36. Hu H.Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Good Health for All. 2015; 9(19): 121-2. [Article in Chinese]
37. Wu H.Q. Comparison of the clinical effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsule in the treatment of threatened abortion. Prescription Drugs in China. 2015; 13(07): 77-8. [Article in Chinese]
38. Yan W. Comparison of efficacy between dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Contemporary Med. Forum. 2008; 16(22): 47-8. [Article in Chinese]
39. Yin J.J. Efficacy analysis of dydrogesterone in the treatment of early threatened abortion. Med. Forum. 2018; 22(34): 4813-15. [Article in Chinese]
40. Chen W.L. Comparison of the clinical effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Med. Informatics. 2016; 29(18): 141-2. [Article in Chinese]
41. Qian Y.X. Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Jia You Yun Bao. 2020; 2(6): 54-5. [Article in Chinese]
42. Lu Y.X. Comparative analysis of the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese Baby. 2020; 1: 110. [Article in Chinese]
43. Chen L.H. Observation on the efficacy and Adverse reactions of dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Health Horizon. 2020; 5: 112. [Article in Chinese]
44. Huang L. A comparative study of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Shanghai Med. Pharmaceut. J. 2019; 40(22): 24-5. [Article in Chinese]
45. Chang M.Z. Comparison of the clinical effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsule in the treatment of threatened abortion. J. North. Pharmacy. 2019; 16(1): 21. [Article in Chinese]
46. Chen J. Analysis of the clinical efficacy of progesterone capsule and dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Health Guide. 2017; 38: 27. [Article in Chinese]
47. Li S.P. Study on the value of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Clin. Laboratory J. 2017; 6(02): 166-7. [Article in Chinese]
48. Liu Y.Y. Clinical value analysis of dydrogesterone and progesterone capsules in the treatment of threatened abortion. Drug Evaluation. 2016; 13(23): 46-8. [Article in Chinese]
49. Ye Q.C. Comparison of the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Med. Inform. 2016; 29(11): 212-13. [Article in Chinese]
50. Lou C., Wang C., Zhao Q., Jin F. Effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone on threatened miscarriage due to corpus luteum insufficiency. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021; 13(5): 4544-52.
51. Dong J.F. Observation on the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. China Modern Med. 2011; 18(18): 77-8. [Article in Chinese]
52. He T.F. Observation on the curative effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone on threatened abortion. China Foreign Med. Treat. 2012; 31(21): 101. [Article in Chinese]
53. Wei Y.L. Clinical comparison of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese J. Clin. Rational Drug Use. 2013; 6(16): 38-9. [Article in Chinese]
54. Dai Z.G. Comparison of the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese J. Clin. Rational Drug Use. 2013; 6(13): 99-100. [Article in Chinese]
55. Li J. Clinical comparison of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Nat. Med. Front. China. 2013; 8(23): 69-70. [Article in Chinese]
56. Chen L. Observation on the implementation effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Health Care Today. 2013; 7: 42. [Article in Chinese]
57. Zeng R.H. Observation on the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. J. Gannan Medical University. 2014; 34(02): 280-2. [Article in Chinese]
58. Zhang Z.H. Clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. J. Med. Theory Pract. 2015; 28(11): 1509-10. [Article in Chinese]
59. Wu Y.F. Observation on the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. World Health Digest. 2014; 22: 104-5. [Article in Chinese]
60. Wu H.Q. Observation on the curative effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone on threatened abortion. Med. Informatics. 2015; 25: 330-1. [Article in Chinese]
61. Li Y.Q. Clinical comparison of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Yiyao Qianyan. 2016; 6(31): 109-10. [Article in Chinese]
62. Yao J. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese J. Modern Drug Application. 2017; 19: 137-8. [Article in Chinese]
63. Ding H.M. Observation on the efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Psychol. Doctor. 2017; 23(25): 64-5. [Article in Chinese]
64. Yu Y. Analysis of the application value of dydrogesterone in the treatment of early threatened abortion. Contemporary Med. 2017; 28: 31-3. [Article in Chinese]
65. Chen L.Y., Cao H.X. Effect of dydrogesterone tablets in the treatment of threatened abortion and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Chinese Foreign Med. Res. 2018; 16(21): 4-7. [Article in Chinese]
66. Xu H.N. A comparative study on the effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. J. Shanxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2018; 2: 47-8. [Article in Chinese]
67. Chang D. Clinical effect of dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese J. Modern Drug Application. 2020; 14(03): 172-3. [Article in Chinese]
68. Zheng Y.M. Clinical effect of dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Guide China Med. 2019; 17(12): 119-20. [Article in Chinese]
69. Zhang Z.H. An analysis of the efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone tablets in the treatment of threatened abortion. Health Friend. 2019; 17: 139. [Article in Chinese]
70. Zhang L., Li Y.X. Clinical efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese Baby. 2019; 2: 132. [Article in Chinese]
71. Huang X.J., Jiang C. Clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Chinese Baby. 2019; 9: 25. [Article in Chinese]
72. Hu Y.J. Comparison of clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. J. Med. Theory Pract. 2019; 32(17): 2785-6. [Article in Chinese]
73. Du Z. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of dydrogesterone and progesterone in the treatment of threatened abortion. Health Friend. 2019; 4: 20. [Article in Chinese]
74. Yu G.X. Comparison of the curative effect of dydrogesterone and progesterone in treating threatened abortion. Chinese Baby. 2018; 10: 120. [Article in Chinese]
75. Wahabi H.A., Fayed A.A., Esmaeil S.A., Bahkali K.H. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018; 8(8): CD005943. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005943.pub5
76. Wang X.X., Luo Q., Bai W.P. Efficacy of progesterone on threatened miscarriage: difference in drug types. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019; 45(4): 794-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13909
77. Lee H.J., Park T.C., Kim H.J., Norwitz E. et al. The influence of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone on threatened abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017; 2017: 3616875. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875
78. Carp H.J.A. Progestogens and pregnancy loss. Climacteric. 2018; 21(4): 380-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1436166
79. Haas D.M., Hathaway T.J., Ramsey P.S. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019; 11: CD003511. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003511.pub5
80. Saccone G., Schoen C., Franasiak J.M., Scott R.T. Jr et al. Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of pregnancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 107(2): 430-8. e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.031
81. Li L., Zhang Y., Tan H., Bai Y. et al. Effect of progestogen for women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2020; 127(9): 1055-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16261
82. Zhao H., He W., Yang Z. A pairwise and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of progestogens in threatened abortion. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2022; 156(3): 383-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13707
83. Kumar A., Begum N., Prasad S., Aggarwal S. et al. Oral dydrogesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil. Steril. 2014; 102(5): 1357-63.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251
84. Coomarasamy A., Williams H., Truchanowicz E., Seed P.T. et al. A randomized trial of progesterone in women with recurrent miscarriages (PROMISE). N. Engl. J. Med. 2015; 373(22): 2141-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504927
85. Тетруашвили Н.К., Агаджанова А.А. Дидрогестерон в лечении угрожающего и привычного выкидыша. Медицинский совет. 2018; 13: 68-72. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-13-68-72
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тетруашвили Н.К., Ших Е.В. Эффективность дидрогестерона при угрожающем выкидыше: систематический обзор и метаанализ. Доктор.Ру. 2022;21(5):53-61. https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-5-53-61
For citation:
Tetruashvili N.K., Shih E.V. Efficacy of Dydrogesterone in Threatened Miscarriage: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Title. 2022;21(5):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-5-53-61
ISSN 2713-2994 (Online)