Peculiarities of Abdominal Delivery of Preterm Labor in the 3rd Level Hospital in Dushanbe City
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-5-62-66
Abstract
Study Objective: To assess the impact of caesarean section rate on perinatal outcomes of preterm birth (PB) in a level 3 hospital based on the caesarean section efficiency ratio.
Study Design: Retrospective group study.
Materials and Мethods. An analysis was made of the PB histories of women delivered by caesarean section in 2021 at the State Institution “Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology” of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Population of the Republic of Tajikistan, as well as data from annual reports for the city of Dushanbe and for the institution.
Study Results. In a level 3 hospital, every third delivery is by caesarean section. It has been shown that the proportion of perinatal mortality (PM) in PD is 5.5 times higher than in urgent delivery: 84.6 vs. 15.4%. In extremely early PD (EEPB) by caesarean section, the proportion of PM was statistically significantly higher than the proportion of neonatal survival: 95 ± 4.9% vs. 5 ± 4.9% (р < 0,001). The efficiency ratio of caesarean section in the 3rd level hospital is low (0.3) due to the high relative contribution of caesarean sections for EEPD and EPB to the total number of cesarean sections and the prevalence of PM over neonatal survival for EEPB and EPB.
Conclusion. The search for reserves to reduce the frequency of caesarean section in group 10 on the М. Robson scale should be carried out among patients with EEPB and EPB.
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out in accordance with the research plan of the State Institution “Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology” of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Population of the Republic of Tajikistan.
About the Author
F. R. Ishan-Khojaeva
State Institution “Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology” of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Population of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
31 Mirzo Tursunzade Str., Dushanbe, 734002
References
1. Gorina K.A., Khodzhaeva Z.S., Belousov D.M., Baranov I.I. et al. Premature birth: past restrictions and new opportunities. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; 1: 12–19. (in Russian) DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.1.12-119
2. Radzinsky V.E. Obstetric aggression. M.: Status Praesens; 2017. 872 p. (in Russian)
3. Radzinsky V.E., Kostin I.N., Olenev A.S., Gagaev Ch.G. et al. Preterm delivery is an unsettled world problem. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018; 6(S3): 55–64. (in Russian) DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2018-13909
4. Radzinsky V.E., Orazmuradov A.A., Savenkova I.V., Damirova K.F. et al. Preterm labour: an open problem in XXI century. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2020; 27(4): 27–37. (in Russian) DOI: 10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-4-27-37
5. Chawanpaiboon S., Vogel J.P., Moller A.-B., Lumbiganon P. et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2018; 7(1): e37–46. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0
6. Vuchenovich Yu.D., Olenev A.S., Novikova V.A., Radzinsky V.E. Cesarean section: border risks and safety. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019; 7(3): 93–101. (in Russian) DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13014
7. Li Van-Khai A.V., Alekseeva L.L. Analysis of the effectiveness of abdominal delivery according “Republican Perinatal Center” for the 2015–2017 biennium. BSU Bulletin. Medicine and Pharmacy. 2018; 2: 36–41. (in Russian)
8. Boatin A., Schlotheuber A., Betran A.P., Moller A.-B. et al. Within country inequalities in cesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2018; 73(6): 333–4. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000573
9. Boerma T., Ronsmans C., Melesse D.Y., Barros A.J.D. et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155): 1341–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
10. Hehir M.P., Ananth C.V., Siddiq Z., Flood K. et al. Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 219(1): 105.e.1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012
11. Serikbolova D.E., Kaipova A.S., Akylzhanova Zh.E., Dernova T.M. et al. Use of Robson Classification for analysis the work of municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management “Pavlodar Regional Perinatal Center № 1” and finding ways to reduce the frequency of surgical intervention. Science & Healthcare. 2019. 21(3): 135–41. (in Russian) DOI: 10.34689/SH.2019.21.3.014.
12. Mol B.W., Bergenhenegouwen L., Ensing S., Ravelli A.C. et al. The impact of mode of delivery on the outcome in very preterm twins. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020; 33: 12: 2089–95. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1540579
13. Visser G.H.A., Ayres-de-Campos D., Barnea E.R., de Bernis L. et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155): 1286–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5
14. Lodha A., Ediger K., Creighton D., Tang S. et al. Caesarean section and neonatal survival and neurodevelopmental impairments in preterm singleton neonates. Paediatr. Child Health. 2020; 25(2): 93–101. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxz051
15. Altayeva А.А., Isenovа S.Sh., Egle М.Z., Bodykov G.Zh. Determination of the absolute and relative contribution indications for caesareаn section according with the Robson classification of the obstetary hospital 3 level in Almaty. Vestnik KazNMU. 2020; 2: 28–31. (in Russian)
16. Miklin O.P., Glazkov I.S., Glazkova I.B., Rumyantseva Z.S. et al. Caesarean section: problems and prospects in the Republic of Crimea. Ulyanovsk Medico-Biological Journal. 2021; 2: 57–68. (in Russian) DOI: 10.34014/2227-1848-2021-2-57-68
17. Robson Classification: implementation manual. WHO; 2017. 52 р.
18. Kutsenko I.I., Borovikov I.O., Galustyan M.V., Abushkevich V.G. Efficacy analysis of abdominal birth in Krasnodar krai. Kubanskij Nauchnyj Medicinskij Vestnik. 2017; 24(6): 84–9. (in Russian) DOI: 10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-6-84-89
19. Illarionova E.N. Preterm birth: impact of delivery method on perinatal outcomes. In: Sikorsky A.V., Khryshchanovich V.Ya., eds. Actual problems of modern medicine and pharmacy 2020: collection of abstracts of the LXXIV International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students and Young Scientists, April 15–17, 2020. Minsk: BSMU; 2020: 25. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Ishan-Khojaeva F.R. Peculiarities of Abdominal Delivery of Preterm Labor in the 3rd Level Hospital in Dushanbe City. Title. 2022;21(5):62-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-5-62-66
Views:
11
Email this article 