Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Lipid Lowering Therapy in Real Clinical Practice
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-8-41-46
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate hypolipidemic therapy in real clinical practice, the frequency of achieving target lipid values and the reasons for ineffective treatment of dyslipidemia.
Design. Retrospective prospective nonrandomized single-center continuous study.
Materials and methods. From 8655 persons referred to any department of Sechenov University, we selected those with documented dyslipidemia and patients prescribed or receiving lipid-lowering therapy. In the end, we selected 3812 patients. In the course of our work, we called all patients. Among those who agreed to participate in the study, we interviewed them: whether they were taking hypolipidemic agents, whether they controlled lipid spectrum parameters, whether they had cardiovascular complications (CVC), and concomitant pathologies. The risk of CCO was assessed during the telephone interview. All patients who required evaluation were invited for consultation at the Center. A total of 3282 patients' data were obtained.
Results. A total of 805 (24.5%) people out of 3282 agreed to be observed at our Center. 130 (16.2%) patients were regularly monitored by a cardiologist at the place of residence. Hypolipidemic therapy was received by 240 (29.8%) of respondents. It turned out that those with higher cardiovascular risk were less likely to reach target lipid values. The mean total cholesterol was 9.2 ± 5.9 mmol/L, LDL — 6.4 ± 3.7 mmol/L, and triglycerides — 2.8 ± 5.6 mmol/L. There were no people with low cardiovascular risk among our sample. The high-risk group included 292 (36.3%) patients, very high risk — 313 (38.9%), and extreme high — 72 (8.9%). In the high- and very high-risk subgroups, 6 and 7% of participants had target lipid levels before the start of follow-up at our Center, and there were no such patients in the extreme high-risk subgroup. Of 805 patients, 590 (73.3%) required correction of the regimen or initiation of hypolipidemic therapy. Among statins, rosuvastatin (n = 218, 36.9%), mean dose — 22.5 mg/day; atorvastatin (n = 165, 28%), mean dose — 56 mg/day; combination of rosuvastatin with ezetimibe at a dose of 10 mg/day (n = 124, 21%) and combination of atorvastatin with ezetimibe at a dose of 10 mg/day (n = 83, 14.1%) were used.
Conclusion. According to our study, the large number of patients have not achieved target lipid levels and the low percentage of patients with proven contraindications to the prescription of lipid-lowering therapy make it necessary to work more actively with patients for primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerosis by prescribing statins.
About the Authors
N. O. KuznetsovaRussian Federation
Moscow
F. E. Mammedzade
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. A. Podyanov
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. A. Shobonova
Russian Federation
Moscow
P. Sh. Chomakhidze
Russian Federation
Moscow
Ph. Yu. Kopylov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Ezhov M.V., Bliznyuk S.A., Alekseeva I.A., Vygodin V.A. Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and statins intake in the outpatient practice in the Russian Federation (ICEBERG study). Journal of Atherosclerosis and Dyslipidemias. 2017;4(29):5–17. (in Russian)
2. Shalnova S.A., Deev A.D., Metelskaya V.A., Evstifeeva S.E. et al. Awareness and treatment specifics of statin therapy in persons with various cardiovasular risk: the Study ESSE-RF. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2016;15(4):29–37. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2016-4-29-37
3. Ezhov M.V., Kukharchuk V.V., Sergienko I.V., Alieva A.S. et al. Disorders of lipid metabolism. Clinical Guidelines 2023. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;5(28):5471. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5471
4. Vonbank A., Agewall S., Kjeldsen K.P., Lewis B.S. et al. Comprehensive efforts to increase adherence to statin therapy. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38(32):2473–9. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw628
5. Oganov R.G., Kukharchuk V.V., Arutyunov G.P., Galyavich A.S. et al. Persistent dyslipidemia in statintreated patients: Russian real-world clinical practice data (Russian part of the DYSIS Study). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(4):70–8. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2012-4-70-78
6. Podzolkov V.I., Bragina A.E., Vasilyeva L.V., Grintsevich Yu.P. et al. Adherence to statin therapy in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk in real clinical practice. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2020;11(1):38–48. (in Russian). DOI: 10.47093/2218-7332.2020.11.1.38-48
7. Lansberg P., Lee A., Lee Z.V., Subramaniam K. et al. Nonadherence to statins: individualized intervention strategies outside the pill box. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2018;14:91–102. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S158641
8. Engebretsen I., Bugge C., Støvring H., Husebye E. et al. Treatment patterns and adherence to lipid-lowering drugs during eight-year follow-up after a coronary heart disease event. Atherosclerosis. 2024;393:117550. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117550
9. Vinuesa-Hernando J.M., Aguilar-Palacio I., Rabanaque M.J., GarcíaCárdenas V. et al. Initiation of lipid-lowering therapy as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2024;90(10):2663–72. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16157
10. Gogolashvili N.G. Moderateintensity statin therapy. Efficacy and safety issues. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(6):5485. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1560-40712023-5485
11. Chubykina U.V., Tyurina A.V., Ezhov M.V. The era of targeted therapy for hyperlipidemia. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(8):6038. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6038
12. Muromtseva G.A., Kontsevaya A.V., Konstantinov V.V., Artamonova G.V. et al. The prevalence of non-infectious diseases risk factors in Russian population in 2012–2013 years. The results of ESSE-RF. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(6):4–11. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2014-6-4-11
13. De Backer G., Jankowski P., Kotseva K., Mirrakhimov E. et el. Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with coronary heart disease: results from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V survey in 27 countries. Atherosclerosis. 2019;285:135–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.014
14. Ofori-Asenso R., Jakhu A., Zomer E., Curtis A.J. et al. Adherence and persistence among statin users aged 65 years and over: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2018;73(6):813–19. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx169
15. Hong S.J., Lee Y.J., Lee S.J., Hong B.K. et al. Treat-to-target or high-intensity statin in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329(13):1078–87. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.2487
16. Lee S.H., Lee Y.J., Heo J.H., Hur S.H. et al. Combination moderateintensity statin and ezetimibe therapy for elderly patients with atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023;81(14):1339–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.007
17. Cai T., Abel L., Langford O., Monaghan G. et al. Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses. BMJ. 2021:374:n1537. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1537
18. Sumarokov A.B. Dyslipidemia. Barriers on the way of the patient to the implementation of medical recommendations. Consilium Medicum. 2021;23(6):511–16. (in Russian). DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.6.200908
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova N.O., Mammedzade F.E., Podyanov M.A., Shobonova E.A., Chomakhidze P.Sh., Kopylov P.Yu. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Lipid Lowering Therapy in Real Clinical Practice. Title. 2024;23(8):41-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-8-41-46