Scientific Justification of Measures to Improve Psychosocial Treatment and Rehabilitation Interventions for Patients with Paranoid Schizophrenia
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-7-63-70
Abstract
Aim. To substantiate the implementation effectiveness differential programs medical and social rehabilitation voluntarily hospitalized patients with paranoid schizophrenia to reduce the hospitalizations number.
Design. Comparative prospective study.
Materials and methods. The study included 100 patients with paranoid schizophrenia, the retrograde duration and anterograde observation was ≥ 3 years. Based on the clinical study clinical and social determinants, three patient’s groups were identified depending on the identified motives for self-seeking psychiatric care: a paranoid motive group (PM) associated with delusional behavior (35%); nonrare psychopathological motives group (NPM) associated with other mental disorders not associated with delusional symptoms (38%); non-psychopathological motives group (NM) not associated with psychopathological symptoms (27%). Further, based on the clinical indicators compliance assessment according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) with the social adaptation level according to the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), patients groups were identified based on the disease clinical picture, cognitive, negative and positive symptoms, as well as adaptation potential, social functioning level and life indicators quality: compensated group (compensation in clinical and social aspects — 15%); decompensated group (clinical and social decompensation — 53%); adapted group (severe clinical disorders with satisfactory social compensation — 20%); conflict group (mild clinical manifestations (the non-psychotic register disorders) and severe social decompensation — 12%).
Results. Based on the clinical indicators compliance assessment with the social functioning level for various groups of patient’s social adaptation, differential programs have been developed aimed at reducing the hospitalizations number, including various psychosocial interventions kinds. The psychotic attacks frequency in the PM group did not change significantly with a sufficiently significant decrease in the independent requests number for psychiatric care from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 1.4 ± 0.3 (t > 2, p > 0.95). In the NPM group, both the psychotic attacks frequency and the number of independent visits decreased (in both cases, t > 2, p > 0.95). In the NM group, it was not possible to achieve a statistically significant decrease in the independent requests number for psychiatric care with an observed significant decrease in the psychotic attacks frequency (t > 2, p > 0.95). The hospitalizations duration in the NPM and NM groups was significantly reduced (72 ± 9 to 67 ± 6 and 38 ± 4 to 34 ± 6 bed days (t > 2, p > 0.95), respectively) while simultaneously increasing the outpatient treatment days’ number from 53 ± 4 to 59 ± 9 and from 42 ± 8 to 48 ± 6 (t > 2, p > 0.95), respectively. At the same time, the remission increased duration only in the NPM group from 0.62 ± 0.25 to 0.73 ± 0.19 year (t > 2, p > 0.95). Clinically, the affective (depressive) symptoms severity according to the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia decreased in the NPM and NM groups (10.2 ± 1.4 to 9.0 ± 1.6 score and 7.3 ± 0.8 to 6.6 ± 0.9 score (t > 2, p > 0.95), respectively), and the psychopathological symptoms severity according to the PANSS scale significantly decreased only in the NM group from 91 ± 4 to 87 ± 6 scores (t > 2, p > 0.95).
Conclusion. Basically, the clinical and social medical care for patients with paranoid schizophrenia are the synergistic complementarity psychiatric care and social rehabilitation, mandatory psychotherapeutic and psychoeducational support for medicines prescriptions.
About the Authors
S. N. GoncharenkoRussian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Shmilovich
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Fusar-Poli P., Estradé A., Stanghellini G., Venables J. et al. The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(2):168–88. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20959
2. Ritunnano R., Kleinman J., Whyte Oshodi D., Michail M. et al. Subjective experience and meaning of delusions in psychosis: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(6):458–76. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00104-3
3. Best M.W., Law H., Pyle M., Morrison A.P. Relationships between psychiatric symptoms, functioning and personal recovery in psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 2020;223:112–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.06.026
4. Susanti H., James K., Utomo B., Keliat B.A. et al. Exploring the potential use of patient and public involvement to strengthen Indonesian mental health care for people with psychosis: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users and carers. Health Expect. 2020;23(2):377–87. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13007
5. Shashkova N.G., Semenova N.D. The patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder that refuse outpatient guidance and treatment. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2019;29(1):24–31. (in Russian)
6. Semenova N. Schizophrenia research involving mental health service users: from subjects to partners. In: The 8th European Conference on Schizophrenia Research (ECSR). ECSR 2021. Virtual. 23–25 September 2021.
7. Prokhorova Zh., Polyakov V., Rychkova L. Art therapy for treating anxiety in adolescents with psychosomatic diseases. Int. J. Biomed. 2020;10(4):453–6. DOI: 10.21103/Article10(4)_OA24
8. Pastukh I.A., Feoktistova E.V., Protopopova M.A., Sirosh D.S. Psychological features of patients with comorbid recurrent affective and panic disorder. Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2021;80: 128–45. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/17267080/80/7
9. Shchelkova O.Yu., Isurina G.L., Usmanova E.B., Iakovleva M.V. et al. Disease-related stress coping and quality of life in patients with surgically treated spinal tumors. MedicоBiological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2021;1:97–106. (in Russian). DOI: 10.25016/25417487-2021-0-1-97-106
10. Gurovich I.Ya., Shmukler A.B., eds. Case study in psychosocial treatment and psychosocial rehabilitation of mentally ill people. M.: MEDPRAKTIKA_M; 2007. 180 p. (in Russian)
11. Semenova N.D., Kuzmenko A.Yu., Kostyuk G.P. Psychoeducation: issues and directions for research. V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2016;4:3–11. (in Russian)
12. Lyashkovskaya S.V., Tashlykov V.A., Semenova N.V. Approaches to the definition and typology of targets of psychotherapy in the context of the tasks of improvement of individual programs of psychotherapy. V.M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2017;1:89–98. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Goncharenko S.N., Shmilovich A.A. Scientific Justification of Measures to Improve Psychosocial Treatment and Rehabilitation Interventions for Patients with Paranoid Schizophrenia. Title. 2024;23(7):63-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-7-63-70