Psychosocial Therapy in Psychiatry and New Forms of Cooperation with Patients
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-6-40-43
Abstract
Aim: To consider new approaches to psychosocial therapy in psychiatry and cooperation with patients.
Key points. The review describes a new direction of research in psychiatry and clinical psychology associated with new forms of collaboration with patients — those receiving mental health care. Among the foundations of this direction are the concept of personal and social recovery and the “Open Dialogue” approach to psychosocial therapy. The movement's leaders are patients and clinicians who involve patients in research as colleagues.
Conclusion. New forms of collaboration with patients — those receiving mental health care, involving them in actual participation in research as colleagues are the basis for establishing trust and therapeutic alliance for developing and selecting diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Expanding the scope of collaboration with patients directly or indirectly increases the availability of psychosocial interventions and psychosocial support and promotes disease prevention and mental health care.
About the Author
N. D. SemenovaRussian Federation
3 Poteshnaya Str., build. 10, Moscow, 107076
References
1. Sass L. A flaw in the great diamond of the world: reflections on subjectivity and the enterprise of psychology (a diptych). Humanistic Psychologist. 2020;50(1):3–32. DOI: 10.1037/hum0000186
2. Fusar-Poli P., Estradé A., Stanghellini G., Venables J. et al. The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(2):168–88. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20959
3. Ritunnano R., Kleinman J., Whyte Oshodi D., Michail M. et al. Subjective experience and meaning of delusions in psychosis: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(6):458– 76. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00104-3
4. Van Os J., Tamminga C. Deconstructing psychosis. Schizophr. Bull. 2007;33(4):861–2. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbm066
5. Anthony W.A. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc. Rehabil. J. 1993;16(4):11–23. DOI: 10.1037/h0095655
6. Best M.W., Law H., Pyle M., Morrison A.P. Relationships between psychiatric symptoms, functioning and personal recovery in psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 2020; 223:112–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.06.026
7. Keetharuth A.D., Brazier J., Connell J., Bjorner J.B. et al. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2018;212(1):42–9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10
8. Pallesen K., Brown J., Rose D., Lawrence V. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of receiving a diagnosis of bi-polar disorder. J. Ment. Health. 2020;29(3):358–63. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1755020
9. Clarke D., Usick R., Sanderson A., Giles-Smith L. et al. Emergency department staff attitudes towards mental health consumers: a literature review and thematic content analysis. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2014;23(3):273–84. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12040
10. Susanti H., James K., Utomo B., Keliat B.A. et al. Exploring the potential use of patient and public involvement to strengthen Indonesian mental health care for people with psychosis: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users and carers. Health Expect. 2020;23(2):377– 87. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13007
11. Neil S.T., Kilbride M., Pitt L., Nothard S. et al. The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis. 2009;1(2):145–55. DOI: 10.1080/17522430902913450
12. Law H., Morrison A.P. Recovery in psychosis: a Delphi study with experts by experience. Schizophr. Bull. 2014;40(6):1347–55.
13. Semenova N., Gurovich I., Rasskazova E., Papsouev O. Developing an outcome framework for measuring the impact of motivation enhancement: a report from a consensus development program. In: Abstract book. Oral and Poster Communications. XVI World Congress of Psychiatry. Madrid; 2014. Vol. 6: 211.
14. Groot P.C., van Os J. How user knowledge of psychotropic drug withdrawal resulted in the development of person-specific tapering medication. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2020;10:2045125320932452. DOI: 10.1177/2045125320932452
15. Slade M. The epistemological basis of personal recovery. In: Rudnick A., ed. Recovery of people with mental illness: philosophical and related perspectives. Oxford; 2012: 78–94. DOI: 10.1093/ med/9780199691319.003.0006
16. Boevink W. Life beyond psychiatry. In: Rudnick A., ed. Recovery of people with mental illness: philosophical and related perspectives. Oxford; 2012: 15–29. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199691319.003.0002
17. Deegan P.E. Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc. Rehabil. J. 1988;11(4):11–19. DOI: 10.1037/h0099565
18. Seikkula J., Alakare B., Aalotonen J., Holma J. et al. Open dialogue approach: treatment principles and preliminary results of a two-year follow-up on first episode schizophrenia. Ethical Hum. Sci. Services. 2003;5(3):163–82.
19. Wusinich C., Lindy D.C., Russell D., Pessin N. et al. Experiences of Parachute NYC: an integration of open dialogue and intentional peer support. Community Ment. Health J. 2020;56(6):1033–43. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00556-0
20. Hjorthøj C., Stürup A.E., McGrath J.J., Nordentoft M. Years of potential life lost and life expectancy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(4):295–301. 21. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. J. Personality. 1949;18(1):108–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
21. Bakhtin M.M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M.; 1979. 423 p. (in Russian)
22. Shashkova N.G., Semenova N.D. The patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder that refuse outpatient guidance and treatment. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2019;29(1):24–31. (in Russian)
23. Wykes T., Haro J.M., Belli S.R., Obradors-Tarragó C. et al. Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(11):1036–42. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00332-6
24. Rose D. Collaborative research between users and professionals: peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatric Bull. 2003;27(11):404–6. DOI: 10.1192/pb.27.11.404
25. Rose D., Evans J., Sweeney A., Wykes T. A model for developing outcome measures from the perspectives of mental health service users. Int. Rev. Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):41–6. DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2010.545990
26. Treasure J., Schmidt U. The cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model of anorexia nervosa revisited: a summary of the evidence for cognitive, socio-emotional and interpersonal predisposing and perpetuating factors. J. Eating Disord. 2013;1:13. DOI: 10.1186/2050-2974-1-13
27. Treasure J., Schmidt U. DBS for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. Lancet. 2013;381(9875):1338–9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60057-4
28. De Bosset F. Core group: a psychotherapeutic model in an outpatient clinic. Can. J. Psychiatry. 1982;27(2):123–6. DOI: 10.1177/070674378202700206
29. Semenova N. Schizophrenia research involving mental health service users: From subjects to partners. In: The 8th European Conference on Schizophrenia Research (ECSR). ECSR 2021. Virtual. 23–25 September 2021.
30. Bateson G., Jackson D.D., Haley J., Weakland J. Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behav. Sci. 1956;1(4):251–64.
31. Semenova N.D., Lyzlova V.O. The efficiency of Involvement in the study of individuals with experience of experiencing the disease (on the model of eating disorders) (in Russian) [in press].
32. Yalom I.D. The gift of therapy: an open letter to a new generation of therapists and their patients. HarperCollins Publishers; 2002.
Review
For citations:
Semenova N.D. Psychosocial Therapy in Psychiatry and New Forms of Cooperation with Patients. Title. 2023;22(6):40-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-6-40-43