Preview

Title

Advanced search

Perinatal Outcomes in the Discordance of the Physical Development of Monochorionic Twins

https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-1-68-75

Abstract

Aim: To compare perinatal outcomes in the group of monochorionic discordant twins, depending on the complications of the antenatal period.

Design: Cohort retrospective study.

Materials and methods. 104 pairs of discordant monochorionic twins were examined: 44 pairs with feto-fetal transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and 60 pairs with signs of selective fetal growth retardation (SSFGR).

Results. In the TFFT + CVDGR group, cervical insufficiency was more common (p = 0.004), delivery before 32 weeks of gestation (OR = 4.84; 95% CI: 1.78–13.18) and there was a higher risk of extremely severe discordance (≥ 50%) (p = 0.018): OR = 4.12; 95% CI: 1.2–14.6. Severe asphyxia was recorded more often in children who underwent TTTS — 34 (38.6%) patients versus 26 (21.7%) newborns of the SSFGR group: OR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.28–4.36, p = 0.006. An inverse correlation was determined between gestational age and the degree of discordance in the SSFGR group.

Conclusion. Differences in perinatal outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic twins with discordant physical development were revealed depending on the type of specific complication of intrauterine development.

About the Authors

M. V. Pavlichenko
Urals Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care
Russian Federation

1 Repina Str., Yekaterinburg, 620028



N. V. Kosovtsova
Urals Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care
Russian Federation

1 Repina Str., Yekaterinburg, 620028



Ya. Yu. Pospelova
Urals Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care
Russian Federation

1 Repina Str., Yekaterinburg, 620028



T. V. Markova
Urals Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care
Russian Federation

1 Repina Str., Yekaterinburg, 620028



References

1. Burton G.J., Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S745–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.577

2. Shakaya M.N., Ionov O.V., Degtyarev D.N., Kostukov K.V. et al. Perinatal risk factors affecting the results of nursing premature infants from multiple monochorionic pregnancy. Neonatology: News, Opinions, Training. 2019;7(2):24–32. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2308-2402-2019-12001

3. Donepudi R., Krispin E., Mustafa H., Espinoza J. et al. Twin twin transfusion syndrome with and without selective fetal growth restriction: predictors of donor demise. Prenat. Diagn. 2021;41(12):1524–30. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6049

4. Sichinava L.G., Panina O.B., Gamsakhurdiya K.G. Fetal discordancy in monochorionic twins. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2015;9(1):6–12. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17749/10.17749/2313-7347.2015.9.1.006-012

5. Di Mascio D., Acharya G., Khalil A., Odibo A. et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019;98(10):1245–57. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13613

6. Gratacós E., Lewi L., Muñoz B., Acosta-Rojas R. et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;30(1):28–34. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4046

7. Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Dzhokhadze L.S., Kuznetsov P.A., Kozlov P.V. Placental insufficiency. Modern look. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 64 p. (in Russian)

8. Bezhenar’ V.F., Ivanova L.A., Tatarova N.A. Chronic placental insufficiency: clinical picture, diagnosis and treatment. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2020;20(6):32–9. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush20202006132

9. Strizhakov A.N., Lipatov I.S., Tezikov Yu.V. Integrated assessment of the severity of chronic placental insufficiency. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;3:20–5. (in Russian)

10. Kostyukov K.V., Ionov O.V., Shakaya M.N. Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with birth weight discordance. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;5:78–84. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.5.78-84

11. Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Kozlov P.V., Kuzntsov P.A., Dzhokhadze L.S. Dissociative fetal growth in twins: serious pathology or normal variant? Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;1:5–9. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18565/aig.2016.1.5-9

12. Corti C.G., Faiola S., Lanna M.M., Castoldi F. et al. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by discordant premature closure of ductus arteriosus. Clin. Case Rep. 2020;8(4):685–9. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2717

13. Rustico M.A., Lanna M.M., Faiola S., Casati D. et al. Major discordant structural anomalies in monochorionic twins: spectrum and outcomes. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2018;21(6):546–55. DOI: 10.1017/thg.2018.58

14. Suzukia S., Indea Y., Hiraizumia Y., Miyakea H. Growth discordance is not an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. J. Clin. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012;2(1):31–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4021/jcgo14w

15. Fernandes T.R.M.M., Carvalho P.R.N., Flosi F.B., Baião A.E. et al. Perinatal outcome of discordant anomalous twins: a single-center experience in developing country. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2016;19(4):389–92. DOI: 10.1017/thg.2016.42

16. Swamy R.S., McConachie H., Ng J., Rankin J. et al. Cognitive outcome in childhood of birth weight discordant monochorionic twins: the long-term effects of fetal growth restriction. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(6):F512–16. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313691

17. Giorgione V., Bhide A., Bhate R., Reed K. et al. Are twin pregnancies complicated by weight discordance or fetal growth restriction at higher risk of preeclampsia? J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:3276. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103276

18. Kalafat E., Abiola A., Thilaganathan B., Bhide A. et al. The association between hypertension in pregnancy and preterm birth with fetal growth restriction in singleton and twin pregnancy: use of twin versus singleton charts. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2518. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082518

19. Qiao P., Zhao Y., Jiang X., Xu C. et al. Impact of growth discordance in twins on preeclampsia based on chorionicity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;223(4):572.e1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.024

20. Yang J., Hou L., Wang J., Xiao L. et al. Unfavourable intrauterine environment contributes to abnormal gut microbiome and metabolome in twins. Gut. 2022;71(12):2451–62. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326482

21. Meirav nezer, Hirschfeld Dicker L., Katorza E., Barzilay E. 887. Neurodevelopmental outcome in discordant monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;222(1suppl.): S553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.900

22. Groene S.G., Openshaw K.M., Jansén-Storbacka L.R., Slaghekke F. et al. Impact of placental sharing and large bidirectional anastomoses on birthweight discordance in monochorionic twins: a retrospective cohort study in 449 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;227(5):755.e1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.059

23. Figueras F., Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 2014;36(2):86–98. DOI: 10.1159/000357592

24. Wang X., Li L., Yuan P., Zhao Y. et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and placental characteristics between selective fetal growth restriction with and without thick arterio-arterial anastomosis in monochorionic diamniotic twins. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04346-8

25. Cao X., Luo Y., Zhou S., Zhao Q. et al. Twin growth discordance and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. Front. Med. 2022; 9:876411. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.876411

26. Tal A., Zafran N., Peretz H., Garmi G. et al. Trend in cesarean delivery rate among twin pregnancies over a 20 years epoch and the accompanied maternal and perinatal outcomes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. X. 2019;3:100023. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100023

27. Proctor L.K., Kfouri J., Hiersch L., Aviram A. et al. Association between hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction in twin compared with singleton gestations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;221(3):251.e1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.022

28. Wandel L., Abele H., Pauluschke-Fröhlich J., Kagan K.O. et al. Mode of birth in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study from a large tertiary centre in Germany. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):214. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04531-3

29. Huntley E., Hernandez-Andrade E.A., Soto E. EP33.16: Differences in size between monochorionic and dichorionic twins before 20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;60:vi, 1–339. Abstracts of the 32nd World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16–18 September 2022.

30. Ichinomiya K., Maruyama K., Koizumi А., Inoue F. et al. Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes between monochorionic and dichorionic twins with birth weight ≤ 1500 g in Japan: a registerbased cohort study. J. Perinatol. 2018;38(10):1407–13. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-018-0190-z


Review

For citations:


Pavlichenko M.V., Kosovtsova N.V., Pospelova Ya.Yu., Markova T.V. Perinatal Outcomes in the Discordance of the Physical Development of Monochorionic Twins. Title. 2023;22(1):68-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-1-68-75

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1727-2378 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2994 (Online)