Prospects of Using Microwave Radiothermometry in Early Diagnosis of Endometritis and Uterine Suture Failure After Abdominal Birth

Aim: To assess the capabilities of microwave radiothermometry (MRTM) in early diagnosis of Postpartum endometritis and uterine suture failure after caesarean section.

Design: Prospective non-randomized clinical trial.

Materials and methods. A comparative analysis of the sensitivity of ultrasound (ultrasound) with dopplerometry and MRTM in the diagnosis of endometritis and suture failure on the uterus after cesarean section was carried out. The study included puerperal women after abdominal delivery (n = 90): 24 patients with a puerperia complication in the form of endometritis (group I), 16 — with suture failure on the uterus (group II), 50 — with a physiologically occurring postoperative period (control group). Assessment of the condition of the uterus and the postoperative suture on it was carried out on the 3–4th day after the operation.

Results. Despite the fact that ultrasound with dopplerometry assessment of blood flow in the branches of the uterine arteries makes it possible to assess the structure of the myometrium and with a fairly high degree of probability to identify its inflammatory changes and defects in the suture, the sensitivity of this method in the early (3–4th day of the postoperative period) diagnosis of endometritis after abdominal delivery reaches an average of 54.2 ± 23.5%, and in the insolvency of the suture on the uterus — 31.25 ± 14.65%. At the same time, the MRTM study revealed indirect signs of endometritis in 66.7 ± 7.9% (if the conclusion is based on only one parameter — the thermoassymetry index, ITA) and 87.5 ± 8.3% (taking into account the combination of three signs), and for the insolvency of the suture on the uterus, the sensitivity of the method is 81.25 ± 4.75% for both ITA and three thermogram parameters, which is 2.6 times higher, than with ultrasound.

Conclusion. Despite the rather high diagnostic effectiveness of the ultrasound method for assessing the condition of the scar on the uterus after cesarean section, the MRTM method has advantages in the form of higher sensitivity, ease of implementation, no need for expensive equipment and specialized medical qualifications. The greatest effectiveness of the diagnosis of postpartum purulent-septic complications can be achieved only with an integrated approach with clinical and laboratory tests and functional diagnostics, and timely prevention and an integrated approach to the treatment of purulent-inflammatory diseases of postoperative puerperia contribute to a significant reduction in the frequency of severe forms of postpartum infection.

1. Savelyeva G.M., Sukhikh G.T., Serov V.N., Radzinsky V.E., eds. Obstetrics: national leadership. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 1080. (in Russian)

2. Korobkov N.A. Structure of nosocomial infectious and inflammatory complications after abdominal delivery. Avicenna Bulletin. 2018;20(1):20–5. (in Russian). DOI: 10.25005/2074-0581-2018-20-1-20-25

3. Baibarina E.N., ed. Maternal mortality in the Russian Federation in 2018 (methodical letter). M.; 2019. 73 p. (in Russian)

4. Kostrubiak D., DeHay P., Akselrod D., D’Agostino R. et al. Emergent postpartum pelvic sonography. Emerge Radiology. 2021;28:857–62. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01927-0

5. Cilingir I., Sayin C., Sutcu H., Alici E. et al. Comparison of postpartum sonographic findings after uneventful vaginal and cesarean section deliveries. J. Ultrasound. 2018;18(75):310–15. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2018.004

6. Covali R., Socolov D., Carauleanu A., Pavaleanu I. et al. The importance of the novel postpartum uterine ultrasonographic scale in numerical assessments of uterine involution regarding perinatal maternal and fetal outcomes. Diagnostics. 2021;11(9):1731DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091731

7. Zuckerman J., Levine D., McNicholas M., Konopka S. et al. Imaging of pelvic postpartum complications. Am. J. Roentgenology. 1997;168(3):663–8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057511

8. Lousquy R., Pernin E., Delpech Y., Ricbourg A. et al. Abdominopelvic ultrasonographic findings after uncomplicated delivery. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2016;97(1):45–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.12.003

9. Krasnopolskii V.I., Buyanova S.N., Shchukina N.A. Pyoseptic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: the specific features of their course at the present stage. Management tactics. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2013;13(4):82–5. (in Russian)

10. Paliulyte V., Drasutiene G., Ramasauskaite D., Bartkeviciene D. et al. Physiological uterine involution in primiparous and multiparous women: ultrasound study. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2017;2017:6739345. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6739345

11. Shchukina N.A., Buianova S.N., Chechneva M.A., Budykina T.S. et al. Organ-sparing surgery in a patient with necrotic endometritis and an incompetent uterine scar after cesarean section. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2016;16(4):80–4. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush201616480-84

12. Ustunyurt E., Kaymak O., Iskender C., Ustunyurt O.B. et al. Role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of retained products of conception. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008;277(2):151–4. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0436-z

13. Sellmyer M.A., Desser T.S., Maturen K.E., Jeffrey R.B. Jr et al. Physiologic, histologic, and imaging features of retained products of conception. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):781–96. DOI: 10.1148/rg.333125177

14. Mulic-Lutvica A., Axelsson O. Postpartum ultrasound in women with postpartum endometritis, after cesarean section and after manual evacuation of the placenta. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2007;86(2):210–17. DOI: 10.1080/00016340601124086

15. Nozhnitseva O.N., Semenov I.A., Bezhenar V.F. The scar on the uterus after cesarean section and the optimal algorithm for diagnostics. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2019;2:85–90. (in Russian)

16. Abu-Ghazza O., Hayes K., Chandraharan E., Belli A-M. Vascular malformations in relation to obstetrics and gynecology: diagnosis and treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;12(2):87–93. DOI: 10.1576/toag.12.2.87.27573

17. Galustyan M.V., Kutsenko I.I., Borovikov I.O., Magay A.S. Opportunities for predicting cesarean scar insufficiency. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2021;12(1):54–61. (in Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2219-8075-2021-12-1-54-61

18. Sedankin M.K., Gudkov A.G., Leushin V.Yu., Vesnin S.G. et al. Microwave radiothermometry of the pelvic organs. Biomedical Engineering. 2019;4(316):45–9. (in Russian)

19. Khashukoeva A.Z., Tsomaeva E.A., Vodyanik N.D. Application of transabdominal and vaginal radiothermometry in the complex diagnosis of inflammatory diseases of the uterine appendages. Treatment and Prevention. 2012;1(2):26–30. (in Russian)

20. Zhou Y., Mu Y., Chen P., Xie Y. et al. The incidence, risk factors and maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture during different birth policy periods: an observational study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):360. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03811-8

21. Moulton L.J., Lachiewicz M., Liu X., Goje O. Endomyometritis after cesarean delivery in the era of antibiotic prophylaxis: incidence and risk factors. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;31(9):1214–19. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1312330

22. Mohamed-Ahmed O., Hinshaw K., Knight M. Operative vaginal delivery and post-partum infection. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;56:93–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.09.005

23. Nozhnitseva O.N., Bezhenar V.F. Combined correction of the local post cesarean scar insufficiency. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018;24(5):45–52. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/repro20182405145