Preview

Title

Advanced search

The Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-1-28-32

Abstract

Aim: to assess the severity of the pathomorphological response according to the classification of Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) in patients with breast malignancies depending on the surrogate molecular biological subtype after neoadjuvant drug therapy (chemotherapy ± anti-HER2 therapy).

Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 90 patients with breast cancer (T0-3, N0-1, M0) with luminal In HER2-negative, luminal In HER2-positive, HER2-positive non-luminal, thrice negative subtypes who were on complex treatment. The age of women ranged from 26 to 39 years (median age — 36 years). A retrospective analysis of the evaluation of residual tumor load in 85 patients according to the RGB system after neoadjuvant drug therapy and subsequent surgical treatment was performed.

Results. In patients with luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer, a complete pathomorphological response was noted in 20% of cases, in 16% — RCB-I, in 36% — RCB-II, in 28% — RCB-III. Among women with luminal B HER2-positive breast cancer, a complete response was achieved in 26.67%, RCB-I was noted in 33.33%, RCB-II — in 13.33%, and RCB-III — in 26.67%. Among the patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, 46.16% had RCB-0, 23,08% had RCB-I, 15.38% each had RCB-II and RCB-III. In participants with thrice negative breast cancer, a complete response was achieved in 41.94% of cases, RCB-I was noted in 22.58%, RCB-II — in 19.35% and RCB-III — in 16.13%. The frequency of complete pathomorphological response (RCB-0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly differed among the more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer (thrice negative and HER2-positive), compared with HER2-negative (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion. The unified assessment of the residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy makes it possible to clearly identify prognostic groups of patients with different treatment responses and plan additional drug therapy for them.

About the Authors

T. P. Shevlyukova
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

54 Odesskaya Str., Tyumen, 625023



L. A. Bahova
Tyumen State Medical University; Clinical Medical Center "Medical City"
Russian Federation

54 Odesskaya Str., Tyumen, 625023



M. S. Shvedsky
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

54 Odesskaya Str., Tyumen, 625023



O. V. Nekrasova
Clinical Medical Center "Medical City"
Russian Federation

32a Barnaulskaya Str., Tyumen, 625041



V. V. Shkuratova
Clinical Medical Center "Medical City"
Russian Federation

32a Barnaulskaya Str., Tyumen, 625041



O. A. Fedchuk
Clinical Medical Center "Medical City"
Russian Federation

32a Barnaulskaya Str., Tyumen, 625041



References

1. Murchison S., Truong P. Locoregional therapy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2021;21(8):865–75. DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1903876

2. Montemurro F., Nuzzolese I., Ponzone R. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer? Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2020;21(9):1071–82. DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1746273

3. Bahova L.A., Shvedsky M.S., Shevlyukova T.P. Prognostic evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer. Medical Science and Education of Ural. 2022;23(3):129–31. (in Russian). DOI: 10.36361/18148999_2022_23_3_129

4. Shien T., Iwata H. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;50(3):225–9. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz213

5. Khorov A.O., Grek N.I. Clinical morphological characteristics of the results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Journal GrSMU. 2019;17(2):199–204. (in Russian). DOI: 10.25298/2221-8785-2019-17-2-199-205

6. Ganusevich O.N., Nesterovich T.N., Achinovich S.L., Fedorkevich I.V. The evaluation of pathomorphosis after neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Vestnik VGMU. 2019;3:61–5. (in Russian). DOI: 10.22263/2312-4156.2019.3.61

7. Fisusi F.A., Akala E.O. Drug combinations in breast cancer therapy. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2019;7(1):3–23. DOI: 10.2174/2211738507666190122111224

8. Achilov M.T., Khursanov E.E., Shernazarov A.H., Khairullaev B.Sh. Evaluation of treatment after polychemotherapy in breast cancer. Research Focus. 2023;2(1):62–5. (in Russian). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7551693

9. Kovalenko E.I., Artamonova E.V. Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Value of residual disease. Medical Alphabet. 2020;20:30–3. (in Russian). DOI: 10.33667/2078-5631-2020-20-30-33

10. Takada M., Toi M. Neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. Chin. Clin. Oncol. 2020;9(3):32. DOI: 10.21037/cco-20-123


Review

For citations:


Shevlyukova T.P., Bahova L.A., Shvedsky M.S., Nekrasova O.V., Shkuratova V.V., Fedchuk O.A. The Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Title. 2023;22(1):28-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-1-28-32

Views: 12


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1727-2378 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2994 (Online)