Preview

Title

Advanced search

Epileptic Status in Early Post-operative Period in Patients with Diffuse Brain Gliomas

https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-7-7-14

Abstract

Study objective. To develop knowledge of the epileptic status (ES) in early post-op period in patients with diffuse brain gliomas.

Design. Single-centre retrospective study.

Materials and methods. The study group included 280 patients with diffuse brain gliomas: 156 males (55.71%) and 124 females (44.29%). The average age of subjects was 45.81 ± 15.90 years.

To identify the diffuse glioma sub-type, 118 patients underwent an examination of frequent mutations of genes IDH1 (exon 4) and IDH2 (exon 4) in tumour tissue using a high-resolution analysis of PCR product melting profile and sequencing.

Results. ES in early post-op period developed in 3.57% of cases (n = 10) and manifested predominantly with motor symptoms (paroxysmal, myoclonic, focal motor symptoms).

Epilepsy diagnosed before surgery was not a risk factor of ES in early post-op period. Awake surgeries, aiming at determination of the functionally significant (verbal, motor) areas of the brain, as well as the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (direct cortex stimulation during surgery) did not increase the rate of ESs. It has been demonstrated that ES in patients with diffuse brain gliomas can develop after a longer surgery (p = 0.0129) or longer anaesthesia (p = 0.0251). The association between ES in early post-op period and cerebral complications has been reported: in patients with complications, the rate of ESs was 17.07% vs. 1.26% (p < 0.00001). in patients without complications.

The rate of early ESs did not drop with preventive antiepilepsy drugs prescribed to patients with diffuse brain gliomas without pre-op epilepsy, as well as with prolonged sedation with propofol and artificial lung ventilation.

Conclusion. ES in early post-op period requires separate diagnostic and treatment algorithms. 

About the Authors

M. Yu. Prokudin
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



B. V. Martynov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



I. V. Litvinenko
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



M. M. Odinak
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



E. N. Imyanitov
National Medical Scientific Centre of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



N. V. Mityushkina
National Medical Scientific Centre of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



E. O. Belyaeva
National Medical Scientific Centre of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



D. V. Svistov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



References

1. Shorvon S., Sen A. What is status epilepticus and what do we know about its epidemiology? Seizure. 2020;75:131–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.10.003

2. Rosenow F., Hamer H.M., Knake S. The epidemiology of convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2007;48(suppl.8):82–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01359.x

3. Bauer G., Trinka E. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus and coma. Epilepsia. 2010;51(2):177–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.15281167.2009.02297.x

4. Giovannini G., Pasini F., Orlandi N., Mirandola L. et al. Tumorassociated status epilepticus in patients with glioma: Clinical characteristics and outcomes. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;101(pt. B): 106370. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.06.014

5. Prokudin M.Yu., Odinak M.M., Litvinenko I.V., Martynov B.V. et al. Clinical and morphological risk factors for the development of epilepsy in patients with glial and metastatic brain tumors. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(11):22–8. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202012011122

6. Stritzelberger J., Gesmann A., Fuhrmann I., Balk S. et al. Status epilepticus in patients with glioblastoma: Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and epileptological outcome. Seizure. 2023;112:48–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.014

7. Louis D.N., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O.D., Cavenee W.K. et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97–109. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

8. Louis D.N., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O.D., Cavenee W.K., eds. The WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Revised 4th ed. IARC: Lyon; 2016. 408 р.

9. Trinka E., Cock H., Hesdorffer D., Rossetti A.O. et al. Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015;56(10):1515–23. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13121

10. Karlov V.A. Determination and classification of status epilepticus (comments to the ILAE report). S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. Special issue. 2016;116(9–2):32–6. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20161169232-36

11. Lv R.-J., Wang Q., Cui T., Zhu F. et al. Status epilepticus-related etiology, incidence and mortality: A meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2017;136:12–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.07.006

12. Lapteva K.N., Savin I.A., Shimansky V.N., Maslennikova M.A. et al. Status epilepticus after brain tumor surgery. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;87(3):65–73. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238703165

13. Beghi E., Carpio A., Forsgren L., Hesdorffer D.C. et al. Recommendation for a definition of acute symptomatic seizure. Epilepsia. 2010;51(4):671–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02285.x

14. Kamogawa M., Ikegaya N., Miyake Y., Hayashi T. et al. Verbal and memory deficits caused by aphasic status epilepticus after resection of a left temporal lobe glioma. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2021;12:614. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_1120_2021

15. Casciato S., Mascia A., D'Aniello A., Quarato P.P. et al. A case of epilepsia partialis continua of abdominal muscles after brain tumor surgery. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23(7):3001–4. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17581

16. Kholyavin A.I., Nizkovolos V.B., Martynov B.V., Svistov D.V. et al. Possibilities of using cryosurgical method in treatment of depth brain tumors. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(1):11–7. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-1-11-17

17. Zabrodskaya Yu.M. Pathological anatomy of a surgical wound of the brain with modern methods of surgical treatment: abstract of dr. med. theses. St. Petersburg; 2012. 36 р. (in Russian).

18. Walbert T., Harrison R.A., Schiff D., Avila E.K. et al. SNO and EANO practice guideline update: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(11):1835–44. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab152

19. Prokudin M.Yu., Litvinenko I.V., Rumyantseva K.A., Martynov B.V. et al. Antiepileptic therapy algorithms in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports. 2023; 42(4):337–47. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17816/rmmar480859

20. Jin M.C., Parker J.J., Zhang M., Medress Z.A. et al. Status epilepticus after intracranial neurosurgery: incidence and risk stratification by perioperative clinical features. J. Neurosurg. 2021;135(6): 1752–64. DOI: 10.3171/2020.10.JNS202895

21. Kling R., Ritvanen J., Mustonen H., Kämppi L. Long-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus: a 10-year follow-up. Epileptic Disord. 2022;24(6):1046–59. DOI: 10.1684/epd.2022.1482


Review

For citations:


Prokudin M.Yu., Martynov B.V., Litvinenko I.V., Odinak M.M., Imyanitov E.N., Mityushkina N.V., Belyaeva E.O., Svistov D.V. Epileptic Status in Early Post-operative Period in Patients with Diffuse Brain Gliomas. Title. 2024;23(7):7-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-7-7-14

Views: 42


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1727-2378 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2994 (Online)