Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Pelvis Pain in Women Suffering from Dysuria
https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2025-24-5-55-62
Abstract
Aim. To establish the nature of psychovegetative and hemodynamic reactions, to assess clinical symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction, to optimize diagnostic search and to determine the tactics of managing patients with pelvic pain syndrome and dysuria.
Design. A prospective study.
Materials and methods. The study involved 244 women of reproductive age with complaints of pain in the pelvic area and dysuria with a disease duration of more than 6 months, including 141 patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and dysuria, 103 — only with dysuria. The control group consisted of 35 conditionally healthy women. The patients underwent laboratory and bacteriological diagnostics, pelvic sonography, urethrocystoscopy. To objectify the pain intensity, a digital rating scale, the DN4 neuropathic pain questionnaire were used, and to assess dysuria, — urination diaries, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were used.
Results. Women with CPP and dysuria had longer and more frequent exacerbations of the disease, the presence of symptoms during remission, and the absence of a clear connection with provoking factors (p < 0.001). In addition to pain and dysuria, patients complained mainly of rapid fatigue, sleep disturbances, and irritability. During treatment, special attention was paid to the correction of pelvic floor muscle syndromes, hemodynamic disorders, autonomic nervous system functioning, and psychoemotional state. Complex therapy was used with an emphasis on pelvic muscle relaxation methods. Positive dynamics were noted in 87.2% of women with CPP and dysuria and in 90.3% with dysuria only. The patients had a decrease in the number of urinations and imperative urges, episodes of urgent incontinence. The severity of urination disorders according to the IPSS scale decreased in patients with pelvic pain and dysuria and amounted to 6.5 ± 2.1 and 8.8 ± 2.7 points, in patients with dysuria only — 4.9 ± 1.3 and 5.9 ± 1.6 points (p < 0.001), which corresponded to mild and moderate disorders.
Conclusion. An integrated approach to the diagnosis and therapy of this category of patients allows to optimize treatment and achieve greater effectiveness, and also helps to improve the quality of life of women.
About the Authors
G. B. BeznoshchenkoRussian Federation
Omsk
N. V. Moskovenko
Russian Federation
Omsk
E. N. Kravchenko
Russian Federation
Omsk
I. V. Savelyeva
Russian Federation
Omsk
E. A. Bukharova
Russian Federation
Omsk
N. V. Nosova
Russian Federation
Omsk
References
1. Rachin S.A., Sharov M.N., Zaitsev A.V., Tynterova M.A. et al. Chronic pelvic pain: from correct diagnosis to adequate therapy. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2020;12(2):12–16.(in Russian). DOI: 10.14412/2074-2711-2020-2-12-16
2. Lamvu G., Carrillo J., Ouyang C., Rapkin A. Chronic pelvic pain in women: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(23):2381–91. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.2631
3. Bittelbrunn C.C., de Fraga R., Martins C., Romano R. et al. Pelvic floor physical therapy and mindfulness: approaches for chronic pelvic pain in women — a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023;307(3):663–72. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06514-3
4. Urits I., Schwartz R., Herman J., Berger A.A. et al. Аcomprehensive update of the superior hypogastric block for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2021;25(3):13. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00933-0
5. Vincent K., Evans E. An update on the management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(suppl.4):96–107. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15421
6. Ayorinde A.A., Bhattacharya S., Druce K.L., Jones G.T. et al. Chronic pelvic pain in women of reproductive and post-reproductive age: a population-based study. Eur. J. Pain. 2017;21(3):445–55. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.938
7. Izvozchikov S.B. Mechanisms of formation and diagnosis of tunnel pudendal neuropathy. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119(11):98–102. (in Russian). DOI: 10.17116/jnevro201911911198
8. Parsons B.A., Baranowski А.Р., Berghmans В., Borovicka J. et al. Management of chronic primary pelvic pain syndromes. BJU Int. 2022;129(5):572–81. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15609
9. Hoyos-Calderon Y.-T., Martínez-Merinero P., Nunez-Nagy S., PecosMartín D. et al. Myofascial trigger points and central sensitization signs, but no anxiety, are shown in women with dysmenorrhea: a case-control study. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(11):1550. DOI: 10.3390/biology11111550
10. Gutke A., Sundfeldt K., De Baets L. Lifestyle and chronic pain in the pelvis: state of the art and future directions. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10(22):5397. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225397
11. Magariños López M., Lobato Rodríguez M.J., Menéndez García Á., García Cid S. et al. Psychological profile in women with chronic pelvic pain. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11(21):6345. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216345
12. Grinberg K., Sela Y., Nissanholtz-Gannot R. New Insights about chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(9):3005. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093005
13. Da Luz R.A., de Deus J.M., Conde D.M. Quality of life and associated factors in Brazilian women with chronic pelvic pain. J. Pain Res. 2018;11:1367–74. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S168402
14. Landis J.R., Williams D.A., Lucia M.S., Clauw D.J. et al. The MAPP research network: design, patient characterization and operations. BMC Urol. 2014;14:58. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-58
15. De Las Mercedes Villa Rosero C.Y., Mazin S.C., Nogueira A.A., Vargas-Costales J.A. et al. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain and primary dysmenorrhea in women of reproductive age in Ecuador. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):363. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01948-y
16. Levesque A., Riant T., Ploteau S., Rigaud J. et al. Clinical criteria of central sensitization in chronic pelvic and perineal pain (Convergences PP Criteria): elaboration of a clinical evaluation tool based on formal expert consensus. Pain Medicine. 2018;19(10):2009–15. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny030
17. Majima T., Sassa N. Organ cross-sensitization mechanisms in chronic diseases related to the genitourinary tract. J. Smooth Muscle Res. 2021;57(0):49–52. DOI: 10.1540/jsmr.57.49
18. Neymark A.I., Razdorskaya M.V., Oberemok P.A. Use of Longidaze in the complex treatment of women with chronic cystitis. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2019;15(10):14–19. (in Russian). DOI: 10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-10-14-19
19. Al-Shukri S.H., Kuzmin I.V., Shabudina N.O., Slesarevskaya M.N. et al. The role of vasoactive medicine in treatment and rehabilitation of women with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Regional Blood Circulation and Microcirculation. 2017;16:(2):25–31. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24884/1682-6655-2017-16-2-25-31
20. Nochvina E.A. The pelvic hemodynamics in women with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Health of Woman. 2016;4(110):108–11. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15574/HW.2016.110.108
21. Cagnacci A., Della Vecchia E., Xholli A. Chronic pelvic pain improvement: impact on quality of life and mood. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019;35(6):502–5. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1540571
22. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Chronic pelvic pain: ACOG Practice Bulletin. Number 218. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;135(3):98–109. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003717
23. Urits I., Callan J., Moore W.C., Fuller M.C. et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2020;34(3):409–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.001
Review
For citations:
Beznoshchenko G.B., Moskovenko N.V., Kravchenko E.N., Savelyeva I.V., Bukharova E.A., Nosova N.V. Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Pelvis Pain in Women Suffering from Dysuria. Title. 2025;24(5):55-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2025-24-5-55-62
















